Friday, June 1, 2007

Want Cleaner Neighbors? Try Peer Pressure

Over the past two months, our readers have left several comments about the conditions of some homes and yards in town. We agree that people should take pride in their homes. They should mow their grass. They should paint their house and, if money allows, landscape their property with trees and flowers. Regrettably, that does not always happen. As a result, we can cite a handful of eyesores in Dorchester.

Recently, a West Virginia newspaper editorial said this about messy properties in its area: "Most cities and counties have ordinances in place to deal with residences that are so unkempt they are a nuisance or health threat. Yet at what point can a municipality make an individual or family keep their home neat and tidy? ...Must code enforcement or police officers stand over individuals with the figurative whip in one hand and statute book in the other as they force them to mow their lawns and trim overgrown weeds. Obviously, it’s not realistic."

Many readers of the Times have written that the Dorchester Village Board must be more aggressive in implementation and enforcement of ordinances to crack down on dilapidated, unsightly homes. But we want to echo the sentiments of the West Virginia newspaper, which wrote: "Although we support codes requiring the maintenance of property — and we wish they were more strongly enforced — it is very difficult, if not impossible, for a governing body to force regular home maintenance habits on the general public.

"It is for this reason we are encouraged by the change in attitude within municipal governments and among many local residents when it comes to beautification of the region. We see the sparkle emanating from residential areas after cities and towns hold annual clean-up events and sponsor beautification efforts. ...And this, we believe, is the real key to code enforcement. It’s easier to neglect mowing the lawn if every home on your street is neglected and in disrepair than when your house is the only one on the block with an overgrown yard. While we do not want to downplay the importance of code enforcement, we believe positive results on the beautification front can also be achieved through peer pressure from others in the community."

We at the Times think most of our readers would agree that a strategy of "peer pressure" could achieve the same results in Dorchester. Instead of looking to local government to clean up our neighbor's yard, perhaps greater strides can be made in sprucing up the town by simply encouraging others to join in the effort.

27 comments:

  1. I agree some homeowners in town could be pressured into picking up their places, but a few of those dumps need to be bulldozed and set ablaze in the middle of the night. no explanation necessary. Free weannie roasts for the kids,

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think the Times shoudl feature a spot where we can name the properties needing a total home makeover!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. i cant believe it

    take pictures of houses and buildings and put them on here.
    is that not singling out people??

    ReplyDelete
  4. c.s.r.,

    And who get to decide whose property needs the makeovers? If they mow their grass, is that enough? Paint? Remove debris? Are you offering to pony up the $$ it takes for them to get their property up to snuff? If you are, I'll give you my name and number.

    Why don't you publish your name so I can see if YOUR property is up to MY snuff?

    ReplyDelete
  5. To the anonymous reader two spots above: Believe it. The pictures say more than we ever could. If you click on the photos, you can even get close-ups!

    However, we did remove one of the photos (the Main Street garage door with the "No Parking" spray painted on it). One of our staff members noted that blemish has been remedied. Perhaps that is due to that same picture appearing on this site a month ago?

    To C.S.R., we will not be featuring a spot for readers to name properties in need of a "total home makeover." We'll leave that job to Ty Pennington.

    But to Mr./Ms. Anonymous who left the comments directly above: In fact, mowing the grass, painting and removing debris from the yard would be a good start.

    That's not asking too much, is it?

    If you can't afford to mow your lawn and pick up your yard, it's time to reconsider your decision to be a homeowner. If you are physically unable, please call a proper entity such as Saline Eldercare and let them know.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don't disagree that some properties could use a little TLC, but publishing their pictures is NOT the way to get that accomplished.

    Shame on the Dorchester Times.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Take your lumps...and get out that camera then...there's lots more photos to get posted. Don't just pick a couple of people out...since you've just appointed yourselves the property gods...get going...get them all posted.

    ReplyDelete
  8. On this issue, we're willing to take our lumps -- and a stand. We believe it's that important.

    When one resides in a municipality, there are certain standards that must be adhered to -- simple rules that must be followed. If you wish to completely let your residence go, there is always the option of living in the country.

    If you choose to live in town, your home's appearance reflects directly on your community's image. The maintenance of your property has a direct impact -- physically and economically -- on your neighbors. Put simply, you have to care a little.

    So go ahead and question our use of the photos, but recognize that we did not use pictures of properties where owners have made a minimal effort to maintain their home.

    And as we noted earlier, we do not believe the problem of unkempt properties in Dorchester is widespread, but is limited to a handful, which are well recognized by most in our community. Perhaps those few others will be pictured in the future.

    ReplyDelete
  9. ok village dweller,
    you give these people an option of cleaning up or moving to the country, what about the animals.

    They are also against village ordinance and have to smell and draw flies.

    lets get them all

    ReplyDelete
  10. How many cars/trucks are allowed to be parked outside a home in Dorchester limits? Does anybody know? On my end of town we have a family with 8 or more vehicles parked regularly outside their home which does not have a garage. It is an eyesore. Is there a limit under city law or can I go ahead and park 20 cars in my front lawn?

    ReplyDelete
  11. as long as the vehicles have current license on them you cant touch them.

    ReplyDelete
  12. to JOe,aka north side nate

    just move across the highway. its out of city limits and you can have all the goats you want

    ReplyDelete
  13. Caring is contageous....if the majority of homes in a neighborhood are kept up well so will the others. How about DACA sponsoring a home improvement contest???????

    ReplyDelete
  14. Dorchester Times, I also agree there should be set guidlines owners should go by with keeping their homes nice. But I absolutly disagree about you posting pictures of people homes and making an example of them. Yes it is wonderful about making examples of the nice homes but when it is negative, people should not be made public examples of that may not be aware of it to defend them selves. Just like you guys not posting anything mean towards individuales, this IS some thing in that same nature. This is a small town and people who read your blog probly knows who these people are that live in those houses. So I ask of you to take the pictures off of your site.

    ReplyDelete
  15. amanda n,

    I agree 100%.

    ReplyDelete
  16. leave those photos up on your site. There won't be any changes otherwise. if anything, put more photos up here

    ReplyDelete
  17. YEAH, TAKE DOWN THOSE PHOTOS, DORCHESTER TIMES. WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE? DON'T YOU DARE POINT OUT ANY FLAWS. WHEN OUR DAUGHTER SLEEPS IN OUR BED AND WETS HERSELF, MY WIFE AND I JUST MOVE TO A DIFFERENT SPOT & PRETEND IT DIDN'T HAPPEN. YOU SHOULD DO THE SAME WHEN WITH COMMUNITY LIFE.

    ReplyDelete
  18. finally
    at least someone has the sense to take the pictures off

    good descision

    ReplyDelete
  19. Taking the pictures "away" does not take our problem away. I see these places every day going to work and I know who resides there....why do we need to worry about the "feelings" of people that could care less about themselves, others or our community as a whole?? I do agree that it's not the most positive approach but then nothing else seems to work. Unfortunately, we ALL have to deal with the few people that don't care--would it be better to have pictures posted on the Dorchester Times blog or having the State Fire Marshall called? Something needs to be done and I personally say "thanks" to the staff of the Dorchester Times for trying to make a difference. from Dorchester resident

    ReplyDelete
  20. Someone actually takes the time to post the concerns about our little town and everyone in that town gets their pannys in a bunch! Problems are always uncomfortable when confronted. Thanks to the Times for taking on the issues that we village folk are too afraid to talk about. You all complain about the pictures, but they got your attention and now you're looking at your own yard to see if it's the eyesore their talking about! Let's take some responsibility. Our town is a reflection on how we feel about it. No one will want to step foot in Dorchester if it looks like trash. We have too much history to not share with others.

    ReplyDelete
  21. The truth hurts, even when it is said by pictures. Not the best approach, but come on Dorchester, lets get our act together, for the class of the town and the school!!!! Dorchester will always be a small town with small town feel. Lets start acting neighborly not nasty, and offer to help eachother. An extra hand offered does more than a nasty comment as you drive by.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Grandad, the people that wanted the pictures down are not dismissing the fact that some certain houses and yards need to be cleaned up, but it is the fact that the dorchester times has repeatedly said on there site that they will not "publish personal attacks" on individuales. I personally think this is a personal attack on the people who live in those homes. I think people who live in Dorchester aleady know and have seen these homes and they don't need to be posted on a web site that does not promote personal negetivity on there readers.

    ReplyDelete
  23. We should all start acting more neighborly, but c'mon. What are you going to do.....knock on the door of one of these houses and say "HI. I DRIVE PAST YOUR HOUSE EVERY DAY AND CAN'T HELP BUT NOTICE IT'S A CRAPHOLE. CAN I HELP YOU BURY THIS DUMP?"

    I don't have the answers but turning a blind eye is not among the choices.

    ReplyDelete
  24. i have a plan

    tear them down and put more sheep and horses and chickens in

    i am sure the people who are going to move out of lincoln to live here wont find living beside a herd of something

    ReplyDelete
  25. cant we all just get along

    ReplyDelete
  26. Arrest 'em. Throw their butts in jail. We got a new one--they should be nice and comfy.

    ReplyDelete

Village Dweller checks all reader comments to determine if they are appropriate for print.