It's an election year. Campaign mailers are flooding mailboxes, including flyers from the candidates seeking the District 32 seat in the Nebraska Legislature.
Senator Tom Brandt is term limited, which is good. A big land owner, Brandt has for years intentionally muddied the waters between state and local taxes. Even during a serious state budget crunch, he brags about the state government spending $1.6 billion a year to subsidize local property tax bills. But property taxes are imposed by K-12 schools, counties, cities, NRDs, and other local government. Brandt is fine with using Nebraskans' money from sales and income taxes to ensure the Unicameral plays "sugar daddy" while the big spenders at the local level avoid accountability. Yuck.
Vying to replace Brandt this November are two candidates, who will also appear on the May primary ballot:
- "Conservative Republican" Mark Schoenrock, an Army veteran and career officer who has served as a Jefferson County Commissioner.
- Shay Smith, a Crete-based lawyer and tax professional who says she's an independent problem-solver. The Crete News published photos of Smith attending an anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) vigil held earlier this year, so we suspect Smith votes Democrat and supports liberal causes. But because the Legislature is non-partisan, voters are at a disadvantage; there's no "R" or "D" after names on a ballot.
This week, The Plains-Sentinel, an online Nebraska publication, wrote: "In a potential surprise from a usually right-leaning rural district, Shaylene Smith, an independent progressive candidate for District 32, out-raised the Republican candidate Mark Schoenrock $57,000 to $30,000 and had nearly $85,000 cash on hand compared to Schoenrock’s $36,000."
No wonder Smith is sending us so many glossy campaign flyers!
The Times decided to investigate the publicly available campaign statements of both Schoenrock and Smith. Three things stood out:
- Senator Danielle Conrad, a liberal activist attorney who is considered one of the far-left leaders of the Unicameral, donated to Smith's campaign.
- Smith's campaign received $25,000 from Democracy Nebraska. This group is a well-oiled progressive activist group that Google's Gemini says is comprised of "Lincoln/Omaha elites" and is "funded by out-of-state interests who want to 'California-ize' our election laws." The AI tool also called Democracy Nebraska "the primary recruitment and training ground for the next generation of liberal organizers" and "a 'who’s who' of Democratic and progressive operatives in Nebraska."
- Wyoming-based Way Back PAC, another "dark money" group, gave Smith's campaign $10,000. Gemini said this about Way Back: "They are systematically funding the infrastructure ... designed to crack the 'red wall' in the West. Their funding of liberal stalwarts in North Dakota and Kansas proves that 'Way Back' isn't about going back to old-school civility; it's about providing a back-door for liberal policy wins in states where the Democratic brand is underwater." Gemini notes that the most significant move by Way Back PAC in recent cycles was their heavy backing of Dan Osborn in the 2024 Nebraska U.S. Senate race. "While Osborn ran as an independent, the PAC’s involvement — alongside traditional Democratic donors — signals their role as a bridge for liberal interests to support non-traditional candidates in deep-red states where a 'Democrat' label is a death sentence."
Only about $12,850 of Smith's reported campaign contributions since Jan. 1 were from individuals from Lincoln, Crete or other nearby communities. That compares to about $10,500 for Schoenrock.
The Times won't endorse a candidate for the Primary Election. But we will take a stand against dark money and suspicious donations fueling candidates who are already avoiding public scrutiny by not running under a party label.
Nebraskans deserve more transparency when it comes to out-of-state or foreign entities funneling cash into our elections.
It should not take hours of investigation to discover who is funding the candidates who are running to make our laws.












