The story continues: "The bond issue will lead to new elementary, junior high and high school additions and demolition of the district’s main building, which was built in 1927 and houses most of its high school classrooms. Other improvements will include a new multipurpose/liberal arts room that can serve as a gym, as well as a new wrestling room and administrative offices.
"The district sorely needed new and renovated facilities, (Rediger) said, partly because of increasing enrollment and an increase in young families in the area.
"To build support for the bond issue, promoters distributed fliers, and the district hosted public meetings.
"And someone, apparently a community member, promoted the bond issue through an Internet blog, Rediger said. He said he didn’t know who administers the blog at www.dorchestertimes.blogspot.com, but he said it provided plenty of fairly accurate information leading up to the bond issue election."
For the record -- and to reiterate a point we have made previously -- the Times never took a position in the school renovation discussion. We did, however, do our best to report the information made available to us. We worked to present both sides of the debate, when possible. And we hope that, ultimately, our stories helped produce better informed discussion among district patrons and decision making at the polls.
** UPDATE: 9/14, 5 p.m. **
The Associated Press also covered the Dorchester School election.
if we are talking school and community pride, why was the pep rally at school cancelled tuesday??
ReplyDeletewhy do we punish all for a few?
And for the record, I reported to the Journal Star that the blog "covered" the news about the bond issue, rather than promoting it. Other than that the story was accurate.
ReplyDeleteThanks to the folks at the Times for their efforts. The blog is enjoyable, informative, and an asset to the town.
Thanks,
Brian Redinger
Now that the decision to improve the school has been made, it's more important than ever for the citizens to keep an eye on the Legislature. This coming session will be the "last hurrah" for "consolidation crazy" State Senator Ron Raikes, Chairman of his "rubber stamp" Education Committee. He's already tried to introduce bills that will force the consolidation of all school districts with less than 900 students. His bill to consolidate all the K-8 districts was repealed by the voters, and as soon as the foot dragging by the Attorney General and the Dept. of Education stops, they'll be back in business. It wouldn't surprise me to see him try to "go out with a bang" by using the same lies and political games again to push through a bill to force consolidation of ALL small K-12 school districts. Keep your eyes and ears open, and keep the local folks in charge of their local schools.
ReplyDeleteDorchester voters got 'R' done and I'm proud that we have the vision to see beyond just today. Here's to the future!
ReplyDeleteIf you are looking to the future, than maybe you should realize that the future doesn't hold much for this town's future. The only way this town will experience any growth is if the meat packing industry expands - which isn't likely. If it does expand, I'm sure all you "blue bloods" won't be real happy that you built a new school for a bunch of "illegals."
ReplyDeleteAw shuddup!!!!!!!! Add something constructive or keep your hole closed............ I hope your comments quit getting printed...... I'll bet your not even from Dorchester or have any ties to town ...... if you do you should be ashamed.......
ReplyDeleteold cynical dripard. where is your "constructive" comment? Hmm...don't see one. Do you even realize that "anonymous" isn't a single entity?? You do dorchester education proud. Do you even have teeth?? Are your eyeballs cockeyed you old inbred sheep loving hillbilly????
ReplyDeleteThe one and only anonymous
I agree with anonymouse...if were looking at are future - than we cant look at are past only the future because thats were are future is and only than can we help are students learn about there future two.
ReplyDelete