Tuesday, August 28, 2012

DPS Activities Merger With Milford Appears Likely


Over the past decade, Dorchester High School and Dorchester Junior High have experienced a significant decline in the number of students who participate in athletics and other school activities.  This decline in student involvement has been an often-mentioned topic on the Times. (It should be noted that schools around the state have experienced similar declines, due mostly to single-parent households and less parental involvement, according to experts.)

Last night, Aug. 27, in a special, town-hall style meeting of the Dorchester School Board, parents overwhelming supported the concept of a proposed activities merger with Milford Senior and Junior High Schools. 

Of the  dozens of Dorchester school district parents who attended the meeting, only two raised objects to the DHS-MHS activities merger.

One source told the Times:  "It's going to happen. They (Milford) want us.  We want them."

According to the details provided to the Times, the merger -- if approved by both school boards -- would impact junior high athletics next year, the 2013-14 school year.  High school sports would be affected the following school year, in 2014-15.  All sporting events would most likely be held at Milford's facilities.  While football seems to be of top concern, it is unclear whether the merger would also apply to basketball, volleyball, softball, baseball and track, or just selected sports.  Also, it is uncertain if the merger would apply to student clubs, such as FFA, drama, FBLA, etc.

As we reported earlier this summer, the shrinking number of DHS and junior high student athletes and club participants has caused many parents with elementary-aged students to wonder if Dorchester will be able to continue supporting current programs a few years from now.  Only 11 DHS students are out for football this year, excluding foreign exchange students.

This latest school board action comes after several complaints were aired earlier this year by some Dorchester School District residents who strongly objected to a plan to join Friend for junior high athletics.  There were reports of aggressive actions by Friend School Board members, who are also large land owners in the Friend district, as they sought to set their own ground rules prior to any activities merger.  (UPDATE: Other Times readers have commented that this is not the case.) One source in Friend told us FPS board members were confident an activities merger could lead to a school merger within two years, which would assist the Friend district with its debt. 

To the best of our knowledge, the plan for an activities merger with Friend has been abandoned, but at least one former Dorchester family has enrolled their children in Friend, which has struggled to field teams of its own.

According to some area residents who spoke to us this summer, Milford officials are very open and interested in discussing the proposed activities merger, but the Times has not spoken to any Milford School Board members to see if the interest still exists.

Milford is classified as a C-1 school in team sports, according to our research.  Merging with a D-2 or D-1 school like Dorchester likely would not affect Milford's status, judging by the numbers needed for Class B attainment.

31 comments:

  1. I wish you guys would cover the baseball and softball teams games. The crowds have been large this season.

    ReplyDelete
  2. With the tech school in Milford, this would be a wise move. Trust me - my 25 year old still lives in my basement.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Dorchester Times will not publish comments with profanities and/or ethnic slurs.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The problem isn't with the lack of students Dorchester has, its kids not wanting to push themselves. To help with the numbers in school activities it should be mandatory that students participate in activities for at least 2 weeks

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with the comment above. If Dorchester does combine sports with another school, my vote is to do so with Milford over crete or friend. Milford has more in common with our residents, I think, and it has more of a future being so close to Lincoln and the interstate.

    ReplyDelete
  7. if yer spoiled kids need something to do i'm hiring.............................................. dig thistles .................................... clean cow lot ................................................... repair fence ..................................... all for $3 an hour ...............................

    ReplyDelete
  8. Mr. SportsKnowItAllJune 25, 2012 at 4:47 PM

    Teams that are orange and purple:

    Phoenix Suns.

    Clemson Tigers.

    And now the Milford-Dorchester LongBeaks.

    ReplyDelete
  9. what are the hard feelings about Friend? I'm interested in knowing why the dislike.

    ReplyDelete
  10. As a parent of former Dorchester students, I am not hostile to Friend or its school. In fact I have many friends in Friend and think highly of the community. The problem is that some of Friend's leaders think very highly of themselves, too. I don't think this select group of individuals have ever wanted to partner with Dorchester on anything. They would only use the Dorchester school for its stable revenue, while asserting their voting rights and eventually killing off our beloved Dorchester High. I will abstain from voting on this blog's survey since my kids no longer attend Dorchester School, but if I were to vote I would vote for doing activities with Milford if such a move is indeed necessary.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I hope we don't have to resort to this.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Let's talk about parents that take their kids out of Dorchester and send them to other schools.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I agree with anonymous about Friend's leaders. They are power hungry & would use DHS to their advantage. I was a former DHS athlete who would find a merger, with any school, hard to take. I am proud to say I'm a DHS Longhorn alumni!!!

    ReplyDelete
  14. THIS SPORTS MERGER TALK WOULDNT BE NEEDED IF MORE DORCHESTER KIDS GOT OFF THEIR BUTTS AND WENT OUT FOR THINGS. PUT DOWN THE VIDEO GAMES. TURN OFF THE STUPID TV. LIVE LIFE. SHOW A PULSE.

    ReplyDelete
  15. The situation could be worse, we could live in Friend or Wilber. Small numbers are temporary, inbrededness is forever.

    ReplyDelete
  16. BIG MAMMA I agree with you.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I am a big fan of the Dorchester students. I don't necessarily think of them as lazy. I would like to see more involved but the NSAA system has flaws, in my humble opinion. What I do know is that students who are in multiple activities put in long days and eventually decide it isn't worth it. Here is an example based upon what I know as a parent with students who attend a Class D school. If a student does One Act or Drama and a fall sport or as with speech season does a winter or March sport the student's day will look like this: Drama/speech practice at 7 a.m., school for 8 hours and then practice unitl 6:30. If they have a game they get home as late as 10:30 or 11:00. This makes a 12-16 hour "work" day. If they need to work a job to help out with all the expenses that come from so many activities they have additional time used up. Sometimes we have events on weekends. Given that teenagers should have at least 8 and preferably up to 10 hours of sleep they can't get the rest they need on a schedule like that. How many adults would WANT to put in 60+ hour work weeks. We need to talk to the NSAA about making it manageable for the kids to do multiple activities. I don't think the kids are lazy, it's just hard to fit it all in when the state pushes class D like a class A school where kids naturally pick and choose activities because the numbers are there to do so. Mr. Pohl does an EXCELLENT job at trying to balance things for our students but it could be easier for all involved if the state would take a look at how seasons overlap etc. ...Oh, and lest we forget...the students should have time to study and maybe have a social life other than school.

    ReplyDelete
  18. If basketball, track, and volleyball are not added they should be. We don't have a track, Milford does. The volleyball team may have 14, but some of the girls might want to play softball or run cross country. The girls basketball team has had low numbers the last couple of years. If we are going to do some of the sports why not just do them all. This way we can sign maybe a three deal if it doesn't work then we can pull out but if it does work then more can be done. For example share classes, activities, maybe they would add orange into their colors. We can do all of this and still keep our school, but add more opportunities for our kids to help them succeed even more with their education.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Wow!!! I am not sure how I feel right now. I am a graduate of Dorchester and have friends in Friend. I feel embarrassed by all the harsh comments about the Friend board who are "power hungry and want to use DHS to their advantage". I personally know the members of the board and they are any thing but that!! They want to see the two schools succeed, whether it be together or on their own or combined. I think the Dorchester citizens and the school board need to look at themselves and ask what they are NOT doing to encourage kids to particiate in activities and to increase the enrollment, rather than downgrade other boards and schools. I wish the best for all schools in this day and age....tough economy and enrollment for all small schools.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Time to abandon ship?August 29, 2012 at 4:53 PM

    I thought when they hired our current football coaches the kids would come out in groves. That hasn't been the case. It is disheartening to see such lack of interest, even among the young kids at the youth football camp. I don't know what it will take to turn things around. Maybe we are simply committed to this current trend that finds us interacting with others less and less, placing our faith in a computer or TV screen instead.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I do not want to go to Milford with any sport that we have enough numbers to stay on our own. Once your sports teams go, people stop going to the school and you loose school support. Milford is also NOT interested in combining with us and changing names or colors. If we want to come play with them, fine, we will play for the Milford Eagles. I really hope our numbers improve and this is only a Temporary agreement!

    ReplyDelete
  22. It will be a two-year trial deal. Milford is paying for new uniforms that say 'milford-dorchester' with purple and orange. Thats what i've heard. if after two years it doesnt work or more dorchester kids start participating to make a legitimate team, the longhorn will rise again.

    ReplyDelete
  23. First the athletics and then the school.

    Just what our town needs. A four million dollar apartment building.

    Should have done more studies before spending all the money.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Top 5 reasons to merge athletics with Milford

    1. More kids, more competition
    2. More alumni live there
    3. Closer to Lincoln and Seward for parents who work in those two towns
    4. They are willing to buy uniforms
    5. They are not Friend

    ReplyDelete
  25. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I don't have a comment regarding the sports merger. I want to make a statement about some of the ignorant/whiny/juvenile comments made on this blog (not limited to this thread). Has it ever occured to you that prospective families considering a move to Dorchester may come across this great website all about Dorchester, only to see some of the ridiculous comments on the articles? If you want the town to grow, then grow up. If you want the kids to be active in sports, then show some interest in them and get involved with them before the sporting seasons roll around. Quit blaming the kids for being lazy and being over-taken by electronics when you are guilty of the same thing! If you have a problem with the way things are going, then get involved. If nothing else, at least show a little respect to the Times staff that works hard to make this a positive site.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Well said Penny Keller, well said!

    ReplyDelete
  28. Amen. What irritates me most are the older adults who get angry with TALK about how we can improve our town. I know that situatuation isn't unique to Dorchester, it's everywhere. I also don't appreciate the quitters who take their ball and go home (i.e., those who transfer their kids just to run away from problems that will surely follow them elsewhere).

    ReplyDelete
  29. One other comment not yet mentioned. At least two Dorchester students aren't out for football because of sport related concussions. They are still healthy, good students and very support of the teams. Unfortunately they are unable to play some of the sports, they aren't lazy, just concerned about their future.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Good thing a new school was built. 4 million dollars for what? Oh yes....my taxes went up! Great job with the planning on that one! Go Longhorns:)

    ReplyDelete
  31. I for one am extremely grateful we built the new school since we can attract better personnel and educators. Had we not built the school, we would have lost our academics as well as our sport teams. As for the kids not going out for sports, that takes a change of culture. Do you have the will and courage to change your culture, Dorchester?

    ReplyDelete

Village Dweller checks all reader comments to determine if they are appropriate for print.