Sunday, August 19, 2018

Our View: Enforce Property Clean-Up Equally




For rules of a town to work well, they must be enforced equally among all.  That simple theory is the premise of today's post.

First of all, the staff of the Dorchester Times says "thank you" to the Dorchester Village Board for its willingness to hire a contract employee in charge of tracking and contacting negligent (or just plain sloppy) property owners.  The code enforcement has made a noticeable difference in our community and it is a model that more small towns in Nebraska should follow.  All Times staff members think the board and contract employee have done a great job in showing real initiative and resolve.

Here are our suggestions to the board to improve town appearance further and help ensure compliance with the property code:

1.) Seriously consider imposing a monthly fine on vacant residential and commercial properties, as authorized by the State of Nebraska under LB256.  In many cases, owners of vacant, run-down properties in Dorchester are paying as little as $100 a year in property taxes.  They have no incentive to do anything with an empty building or home -- to improve it, rent it or sell it.  Thus, those negligent owners drag down the town with their dilapidated building.  But if they are charged a $100-per-month unoccupied-property fee from the Village of Dorchester, their wallets would dictate their actions.

2.)  The Village of Dorchester should equally and rigidly enforce its threats of legal action against negligent property owners.

That second point is important.  

Recently, we learned of a Dorchester property owner who was forced to take immediate action to either repair or remove an old garage next to the school.  Last month, that garage was completely torn down and cleared from the site, which improved the appearance of a very prominent area on a well-travel street. However, there are far worse structures around town.

We don't know the particulars of the process or the wording from the village.  But the same process should be used for other problem properties in town, including the two pictured on this post, which are much worse than the former garage on 9th Street.  (One of the garages pictured is at the corner of 9th St. and Lincoln Ave. -- which is very visible from main street.  The other garage is located on 8th St. and happens to face another dilapidated garage on the opposite side of the street.)

For a municipality's code to have teeth, it must be enforced strictly and in a timely manner on all parties.

15 comments:

  1. Love it. Right on right on

    ReplyDelete
  2. Don't forget about the dumpy garage north of 10th and Stephens. https://www.google.com/maps/@40.6504157,-97.1175287,3a,75y,262.76h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sm3B_iPeF7I3Fc_VAA1tY7Q!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3Dm3B_iPeF7I3Fc_VAA1tY7Q%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dsearch.TACTILE.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D96%26h%3D64%26yaw%3D262.76025%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656

    ReplyDelete
  3. Who is running 4 Village Board in November?

    ReplyDelete
  4. 9th & Jackson is becoming a Log Jam.

    ReplyDelete
  5. #2. Is a real sore spot for me. Although the intentions were “noble” in the beginning, the person currently making the assessments does not use practical judgement, but rather on whether you are her friend or not. Frankly speaking, we need someone who is unbiased, reasonable, methodical, and well...honest. Basically, if she doesn’t like you, she sure as heck won’t hold back in giving you a notice about your property. Also, from what I gather, she is already on another committee, which means she can really mess your life up. I say bring in someone who doesn’t have an agenda of their own.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your kidding, right? She is going to screw up your life by telling you to clean up your crap and that you can't get a building permit if you don't stay within code and zoning regulations? Sounds like someone is being a bit over dramatic. And just for your information, I consider her a good friend, and she sent ME a letter last summer. and guess what, my life isn't messed up at all because of it. Get a grip, people.

      Delete
    2. Over dramatic?

      On anonymous internet posts??

      No way! Couldn't be!!

      Delete
    3. “...if she doesn’t like you...”. Sorry, but your argument lacks practical, unbiased evidence. Sounds to me like you may not like this person and are trying to affect her livelihood (and/or reputation). If your phone is ringing, it might be the pot calling the kettle black.

      Delete
  6. Here's hoping we get some stronger backbone to bring about timely enforcement!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. One more point, hope you guys realize that its the boards responsibility to do the enforcement!

      Delete
  7. In the words of Rodney King, "Can't we all just get along"?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Them some dumpy lookin sheds!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Unbiased not a bad idea but it should be consistent either way.

    ReplyDelete
  10. To me, just a humble sixth-generation resident of Dorchester, the most infuriating aspect of the blighted property in town is that much of it is due to negligence of non-residents who live in Lincoln or much further, even out of state. It's easy not to care about Dorchester when you don't live here or ever plan to. Time to put that vacancy tax in place that this blog has written about!

    ReplyDelete

Village Dweller checks all reader comments to determine if they are appropriate for print.