Friday, September 14, 2012

Village Begins Clean-Up Initiative


Many in Dorchester already know the story, but we decided that the village's new clean-up initiative deserves to be reported by the Times.

The latest issue of the Southeast Nebraska Development District (SENDD) newsletter reports, "The Village of Dorchester has kicked off a new 'Nusiance Abatement Program' to encourage residents to clean up their properties. Dorchester officials are working with SENDD to help identify and notify resident of potential violations. The goal is to build community pride within Dorchester."

One community leader, who was once part of the Dorchester Times staff, said this initiative was "long overdue."  In an e-mail, he told the Times that since the late 1990s, Dorchester had turned a "blind eye to a small handful of property owners or renters" whose yards and homes "look like the county dump." (Those are his words, not ours.)  He wrote that the new notification program is a "clear shot over the bow" for those few residents "who refuse to uphold community standards and in the process bring down the entire town."

"There are more responsibilities to property ownership in a town than just paying the taxes," this individual e-mailed the Times.  "Just because you pay your property taxes doesn't mean you can live like Fred Sanford. Residents who don't want to clean up can always move to the countryside."

The SENDD story continues: "The first area of town to be assessed is (the area between) 7th Street to 11th Street and Washington Ave. to West Line."  The owners of properties requiring clean-up "will be notified by a certified courtesy letter from SENDD." 

"Residents in all areas of town are encouraged to keep their properties maintained," the story notes.  "Common concerns include unlicensed vehicles (including yard and boat trailers), auto parts, dead trees, brush, lumber and trash."

The village board will review properties with continued nuisance concerns at their regular board meeting in early October.  "For those properties not cleared, formal action may be taken and the property could be declared a nuisance by the board.  SENDD is the designated nuisance officer for this project."

One village leader, a business owner, told us that he agrees with the clean-up effort being conducted by village officials.  He added that he hopes people don't forget all of the improvements that have been made across town, including the main street electronic marquee, upgrades made to the city park, and repairs of the buildings along main street.

20 comments:

  1. I thought we already had a building inspector. Are we now paying for two people to do the same job

    ReplyDelete
  2. Iam so glad that these issues are going on, just hope that the village takes it seriously and stands behind this. It needed to be done along time ago. A fence is needed to be put on main street, to hide all the abandon cars on a lot. Lots a good things happening in town, this is the best thing they have done, since the playground and the new snack shack, and the school.

    ReplyDelete
  3. main street electronic marquee, upgrades made to the city park, and repairs of the buildings along main street.
    To me thats not enough from the village of dorchester law makers , what about the streets in this town , washbroads all over ,why punish resendants when the village broad cant do there job

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good job, village council members. I'm proud of you all for showing backbone. Lack of spine is killing this country, from the allocation of welfare to the lack of immigration enforcement to allowing whiskey tango women to have five kids from five different men [and then paying them to breed like rabbits].

    ReplyDelete
  5. The fence on main street shouldn't be needed with this "clean up initiative". They(abandoned vehicles)will have to be removed. Great job villiage board for starting this, it was long overdue.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It's about dang time!

    ReplyDelete
  7. How much are these letters costing the village?

    Maybe we should use that money to pave our streets

    ReplyDelete
  8. Think it would be nice if the grand old buildings, especially the old bank, could be restored to their original look. All the modern add-ons detract from the basic beauty of old buildings.

    Just a thought.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hi. Me is an investigative genius. I decided to take on the question two spots above. The answer is $4.50 -- ten stamps on ten letters. Get angry at all those wasted dollars.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yea

    some people dont have a clue.

    These people checking properties are not working for free.

    I would also be interested in knowing how much the village has spend on lawyer fees in the last couple of years.

    We have a law suit going on now that is costing the village tons.


    Pull your head out of the sand. Do we need to spend all this money to get a couple of pieces of property.

    ReplyDelete
  11. At yesterday's church auction, I spoke to more than three dozen individuals. Every one of them said something to the effect that it was about time the city went after some of the trashy homes. All I heard was support for the initiative. No negative comments. Go, village board, go!

    ReplyDelete
  12. About time this town gets cleaned up. :) It would be nice to see fresh paint on the walls.. the buidling above the city office needs some paint for sure. It looks bad with just the gray showing..if everyone has to clean up then so should the town by taking care of there buildings.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I agree with comment above.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Why even fix that building up

    It's not handicap accessable

    You have the land. Build a new office and library

    ReplyDelete
  15. I heard it cost the village 120,000.00 to have the person or people to check properties in town. I think we could have spended that money some where else just my opinion

    ReplyDelete
  16. The person is a relative to our city attorney

    Conflict of interest?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Sounds like the 'fred sandfords' are sensing the writing on the wall ... clean up or ship out. By the way dorchester times, keep fred out of this ... he's not white trash, which is the problem that dorchester faces with the unkept homes.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Wow

    Some people don't have a clue

    A four million dollar school, a million dollar sewer plan, and a handful of business that people don't supporT

    LET'S LOOK AT SPENDING MONEY ON THOSE THINS INSTEAD OF CLEANING UP A COUPLE OF PROPERTIES BECAUSE A COUPLYE BOARD MEMBERS HAVE PERSONAL VENDETAS

    ReplyDelete
  19. Dorchester city officials have always been good at letting personal vendetta's dictate policy (I've lived here for over 50 years and seen it often). That is part of the reason the city is in the mess it is now. We need leaders who don't look at names and look objectively at making the town a better place to live. That is the only way Dorchester will ever grow.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Name, what is a name, doesnt make you any better, or how much land you have or money. Its time for the town to be cleaned up, and if it hurts someone feelings, it will go away, just like the mess in town will. It is changing, its starting, does it really matter how much it cost, to get people off their butts, and make this town look clean, Pride in yourself, town, home, and community. Thats all!

    ReplyDelete

Village Dweller checks all reader comments to determine if they are appropriate for print.