Wednesday, April 7, 2010

EDITORIAL: Put Paving On The Ballot

On the issue of paving, it is time to let the people decide. Let's put the question on November's ballot.

This is the position of the Times staff.

Monday's townhall and public meeting held by the Dorchester Village Board -- and attended by approximately 75 residents -- revealed several challenges facing our community. Not only are the streets a mess, but the village will soon need to devote some dollars to repairing drinking water infrastructure, including the water tower.

But comments from the public made it clear: There is a strong resolve to at least begin the process of paving Dorchester's streets. (After our many rants on community appearance, we take satisfaction in knowing we have lots of company.)

As one Dorchester resident told the board, we have a choice. We either address Dorchester's street problems today or we pass them off to next generation. And if we chose the latter, there may not be a next generation.

Also, as another townhall participant commented, there will never be another time in the next 30 years when materials and interest rates are as low as they are now.

We were very disturbed to hear a small handful of Dorchester property owners who live in other communities are opposed to Dorchester residents attempting to improve their quality of life. This issue needs to be decided by the citizens of Dorchester -- not by real estate owners who reside in Friend or elsewhere.

We are hopeful more young people, those under 40 years old, will speak up. In 1979, it was primarily the opposition by young families that killed paving. This time around, let's hope that it will be the vocal support for paving from this age group that pushes the issue through to fruition.

With paved streets will come new home construction; more home improvements; increased property value; less damage to vehicles; better air quality; less money spent on gravel and city employee labor; a renewal of community pride; and a better quality of life in general. Supporting paved streets is the easy call. Finding the means to pay for them is a much more difficult task. But to delay the project would be Dorchester's ultimate folly.

It's time to let the chips fall where they may. The well-being of Dorchester is in the balance.
(Note: Due to the numerous posts regarding paving, street-related reader comments may be found here.)