Sunday, May 6, 2007

May 9 Meeting Will Focus on Future of School (and Town)

The Dorchester School's monthly newsletter confirms there will be a public meeting this Wednesday, May 9, to discuss the deteriorating conditions of the school's main building, as well as options to replace the 80-year-old main structure. The meeting will allow patrons to view the results of the new construction study and look at options presented to the School Board. Tours of the facility will be conducted following the presentation.

The meeting is to begin at 8 p.m. in the multi-purpose room. All Dorchester School patrons are encouraged to attend this important meeting regarding Dorchester's future. (For more background on the meeting,
click here.)

As patrons ponder whether to invest in a new school building, we wanted to step back and examine the educational situations in nearby communities.

Today's Lincoln Journal Star includes an article on the closing of the school in Bradshaw. Some of our readers will recall that Bradshaw was once part of the Crossroads Conference, which still includes Dorchester. While Dorchester has advantages that Bradshaw does not -- including a larger population and relative proximity to Lincoln -- there are similarities between the two communities. Therefore, we believe today's Journal Star story is quite relevant.

Here are some edited excerpts from the news article:

BRADSHAW, Neb. — Sixty miles west of Lincoln, Bradshaw's last day of school -- the last playground banter, the last hurrah -- is coming up much too quickly, May 18. ...The Heartland school board (formerly Henderson) voted 5-1 in December to close the Bradshaw attendance center and to bus all the students to Henderson, 11 miles away. That ends an educational tradition that began in Bradshaw 126 years ago.

Sharon Zierott, the only Heartland board member from Bradshaw, cast the single no vote before stepping down. “When they start hauling things out of the school, that’s when it will probably be the hardest,” she said. Zierott, part of the class of 1954, sees Bradshaw's future as a matter of taxation without representation.

Several players from the eight-man Bradshaw team that won a state championship in 1969 went to a recent school board meeting. They were there to ask that all the trophies and awards Bradshaw students won before the 1998 Bradshaw-Henderson consolidation go to the Bradshaw Community Center for display. “We’re losing our heart,” they said. “We’re not going to lose our past, too.”

Bradshaw’s downtown business district appears past its most prosperous point. There’s no grocery store, for example, and no hardware store. There is a bank, a post office, a grain elevator, and several other businesses clustered either downtown or a few blocks away along U.S. Highway 34. Perry Siebert of Siebert Custom Paint and Body doesn’t feel so good about what’s happening to local education. “I think it’s a bad deal,” he said. “Properties will be devalued because of it.”


These excerpts reveal not only the struggles Bradshaw has experienced following its consolidation with Henderson, it also provides a glimpse of things to come for all small communities that lose their school. Put simply: As goes your school, goes your town.

As Wednesday's meeting approaches, we are reminded of the question posed by Dorchester Superintendent Alan Ehlers: "Will we be known as the generation that allows future generations to suffer with below standard facilities -- or worse, a consolidated district that may cause the town to decline and send tax dollars to another town and district?" The choice is up to the residents of the Dorchester school district.

19 comments:

  1. Are you crazy....a new school? That might raise my property taxes in town. I'd much rather have my property tax dollars go the big boys in Friend or Wilber or maybe even Crete. God forbid we try to keep what's ours and make it better.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I plan to attend. right now I don't have strong feelings either way and plan to keep an open mind

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have strong feelings...we don't need a new school...we need to take care of the one we have.

    Why is it that a few years ago, we had people coming in telling us that our school enrollment was going down and we had to consolidate and when the citizens raised all kinds of stink about that...it was dropped.

    NOW...same thing only we're going the other way. We have people coming in telling us that our school is overcrowded. Its time for the citizens to stand up against building a new school too.

    We need to do some preventative maintenance on the building we have. We don't need to build a new building.

    Things change, enrollments go up and down. How about looking into other options before we spend millions building a new school?

    We need to let the school board and ehlers know that we don't need or want a new school. Put some effort and money into the one we have now.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sticks in the mud make lousy pathways to the future. Looks like the same mental brigades that led the charge against paved streets will take up the fight against improving the school. Me thinks their numbers are dwindling. Do whatever it takes to improve the school before Dorchester does a Bradshaw.

    ReplyDelete
  5. We at Dorchester Times don't think either option (improving the current structure or a new building) should be discounted. Perhaps another 10 or 15 years can pass before major reconstruction.

    We also agree with previous comments that enrollment will continue to fluctuate. That's life in a small town.

    However, we hope all readers will keep an open mind -- and keep in mind that the main component of the school was build in 1927. Only so much can be done to repair a Model T before it needs to be replaced.

    We hope all reader and Dorchester School patrons will continue to submit constructive comments. We especially urge younger patrons -- those with children in the school system or about to enter -- to submit comments. We want to know your thoughts.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dorchester should consolidate with Friend before building a school. There will doubtfully ever be enough students enrolled at our school to ever make it worthwhile to build a whole new school. Give the kids more opportunites by having a bigger school. Don't build a new school.

    ReplyDelete
  7. hey village dweller...why do you let Friend people make comments here. Of course they want the schools to merge. Think how easily they could write off their $500,000 debt all while telling dorchester taxpayers what to do. I rather my two kids go to dorchester without any improvements made. They will still have more opportunity here and won't have to put up with a 15 minute bus ride to Friend!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. As we’ve stated from the first day of this publication, we allow anyone to read and leave comments as long as the input is free of expletives and personal insult. Also, we are well aware that the Dorchester family extends beyond the 68343 zip code.

    However, we also believe that calls for school consolidation are extremely misguided, and we challenge any consolidation proponent to name one Nebraska town that has improved its conditions due to the consolidation of its school.

    Too many Nebraskans across the state have adopted the belief that a school is a place where we invest in young people until age 18, when they're handed a diploma and expected to never to return. School consolidation only encourages that philosophy of failure.

    We think a town's school needs to be part of a community's formula of sustainable success -- not just a springboard for its young people.

    ReplyDelete
  9. lets just fix it up to the best that we can. its still a great school.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The comments directly above have been edited. Again, we will repeat the policy of the Dorchester Times: "All comments will be published unless they contain expletives, racial or ethnic epithets, personal insults or unverifiable rumors."

    ReplyDelete
  11. I did not go to Dorchester, but have a spouse who did and children who hopefully will have the same opportunity to go to a small school. At first thought, I was not for the new school, but after talking with another person who did NOT go to DHS, but to another school where they ended up consolidating, she informed me that by building the school, in the event that consolidation does occur, the best school would be used... in this case Dorchester over Friend would be used.

    It seems to be the attitude in the community that if someone doesn't have kids/grandkids in school, then they vote NO to save them some money. Seriously, by looking at the increase, the tax increase is only a couple cents difference than just making the minimum renovations that have to be made.

    I encourage everyone to keep an open mind for the sake of the children who have yet to get a good education. Don't we as a community want to be part of our youth's success? How can we do that if we don't have a good school and teachers?

    Without the Dorchester school system, the community will fall apart. Families will leave and the town will probably become very poor. It would be nice if more people in town supported change so that we could have a well known community for it's cleanliness and goodness and not be known as a tiny dirty town. Let's give this town a good reputation!

    ReplyDelete
  12. There has been talk about a consolidation for almost 20 years now. The class of 1990 was supposed to be the last class to graduate from Dorchester. This new "part" to be added on to the school is around 1/3 of what it would cost to consolidate. This is just adding on to what is already exsisting, and getting rid of the old part of the school. You can't tell me that if there would be a consolidation, a new school would not be needed.

    There will always be kids to go to school, and if we would build the new part of the school, we will undoubtly draw more numbers.

    Yes, I have done my homework. Please do yours before you make a decision.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Cynical Richard whoever you are u need to open your eyes why dont u come to the school some time and just go stand in a class room. U should see 35 kids being packed into a 10-20 room with no AC. Are school IS over crouded and we do need a new one to keep this school going. if not a new school we need to fix this one up. just think to fix are school it will cost 2.4 million to build a whole new school it will cost 4 million.. if we fix it up we dont solve any size problems!! WE NEED A NEW SCHOOL!!

    ReplyDelete
  14. we will have to do something sometime because the classrooms are so small if u were a student at this school i bet that you would have different opinions

    ReplyDelete
  15. I guess I am still having questions and concerns with the option enrollment policy. People come on here and say that are school is overcrowded and cramped but yet we keep allowing other kids for other districts to come in.

    and with gas at three bucks a gallon does it make sense to send a bus to crete to pick up kids.
    Why should these people have the benefit of free transportation. Just like students in the country, these people choose to live there and the taxpapers pay the bill.

    if we all agree that times are changing, look at the transportation issue and the dollars we are spending to deliver all these kids to school. This isnt 50 years ago. I would almost believe that this borders on discminination. Come pick my kids up and i could save some money too

    ReplyDelete
  16. I was just wondering why the "9 concerned citizens" did'nt publish my comment which was much like Anonymous' opinion on the option enrollment? It was free of "personal insults, and expletives". There was nothing insulting any race or ethnic backround. Maybe it wasn't received, but if it was I would say that it must have offended one of you.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Mr./Ms. Anonymous:

    Exactly which of the hundreds of comments by "anonymous" are you referring to?

    Please sign your response if you want us to recall specific messages. (Simply mark the "other" box in the comment box and type a pen name.)

    It's obvious that we publish almost every comment we receive, every day. You must have written something that one of the editors didn't approve of. If you're looking for us to perpetuate rumors about named individuals, you're barking up the wrong Web site. Save it for the coffee shop.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Village Dweller, Do you know if the school gets special funding for option enrollment students?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Potential Option Enrollment Parent:

    The short answer is "yes." But we're not experts on Nebraska's school funding formula. Your question could be answered best by school administration staff.

    We do know that the state's "net enrollment option funding" provides financial aid based on total enrollment. Based on this formula, option enrollment students mean more state aid for schools of any size.

    Keep in mind that regardless of school size, the vast majority (approx. 60%) of Nebraska school funding comes from district patrons in the form of property taxes.

    ReplyDelete

Village Dweller checks all reader comments to determine if they are appropriate for print.