Wednesday, September 5, 2018

FLASHBACK: Readers Want New Housing In Dorchester (And Now We Know It's Coming)


In May 2014, the Dorchester Times asked readers who lived in Dorchester if they wanted to see new housing built in our community.  More than 60 readers/residents responded to the survey.    


When we asked if they supported new housing in Dorchester, an overwhelming 83% of respondents said "yes."  Around 17% said "no."




Those who said that they wanted new housing in Dorchester were then asked which area of town would they like to see new homes built.  Readers were evenly divided, with 40% saying build north of town and 40% saying south of town.  The rest wanted housing elsewhere.

We bring up this four-year-old survey because now the Times can confirm that action is being taken by village leaders to grow Dorchester -- in geographic size, anyway.  Dorchester officials have annexed a large piece of farm ground immediately north of town for purposes of housing development.

The land being annexed is owned by William J. Plouzek.  The area's boundaries are 12th Street to the south; the Hwy 6 spur (or County Road 1400) to the west; County Road D to the north; and County Road 1450 to the east.

From what we know, following the annexation, the Dorchester Village Board will use an economic development tool known as "tax increment financing" (TIF) to provide an incentive to build new homes.  Authorized by Nebraska voters in 1978, TIF diverts taxes generated by the increase in a redeveloped property's taxable value to reimburse the cost of new infrastructure over as much as 15 years. Of course, there would have to be sufficient interest and a commitment to build new homes. 

According to sources, at least two new homes are going up in Dorchester this fall (on 9th Street and 12th Street).  At least two additional homes are being planned to be constructed in the northeast section of town. (Also, don't forget that these lots in are available for housing.)

Which brings us to another survey (conducted by the Times in March 2014) of 20 DHS alumni ages 18-30 showed that 80% of these young people -- many of whom have already married and/or have children -- would currently consider moving back to Dorchester.  However, nearly all of those alumni said there would need to be adequate housing.  Others told us they would not move back unless there were more streets with paving.  We've heard the same sentiments from Baby Boomers in or near retirement.

13 comments:

  1. I thought Lyle Weber commented on this last time .... just saying

    ReplyDelete
  2. Would the new street be paved?

    ReplyDelete
  3. How much property tax dollars does the village get from the farmers cooperative? And I'm told another $2 million of investment is going in this summer.

    And we can't get a serious look at new housing development? Really??

    ReplyDelete
  4. They can get more serious about it when the property owners and the developer come to a meeting!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Go Huskers! Let's all get warm and fuzzy.

    ReplyDelete
  6. With all the talk of paved streets, has anyone asked where the money goes that the village gets from Keno sales???
    I would think as much as people spend on that, there would have been some streets already paid for by now....
    Just an opinion: why would you go forward on development if the streets can't even get paved???

    ReplyDelete
  7. 10 percent of keno sales ain't going to pave many streets

    ReplyDelete
  8. WHY WON'T THE BOARD JUST PUT THE PAVING ISSUE TO A VOTE OF THE TOWN'S PEOPLE?

    SCARED IT WILL PASS???

    ReplyDelete
  9. There have been 5 homes that have sold here in town, and guess what there no paving.People are buying homes. I think the pavements pushers should rethink, it's the town that is growing, no matter if there is paving or not. You could put it to vote, but everyone knows what the outcome will be. Dorchester is growing, no matter if there is paving or not.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Interesting discussion here. I bought a home in Dorchester a while back simply because it was on a paved street.

    I can tell you that I would not have done the same had the house been on a graveled, dusty road. Sorry. Just stating the truth.

    I do wish the town leadership would allow residents to vote, for once and for all, on the paving issue. I think some board members have been swayed to oppose paving just to "go along along to get along."

    Maybe the better solution is just to start a new development on the outskirts of town as the bloggers have talked about. Pave there and see what happens.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I have a question...If the streets would get paved, how would the cost be distributed? Meaning, would it be on a 20 year bond like the renovation of the school is? I would think grants would be involved as well.

    I believe that when the first informational meeting was held, big numbers were given to the citizens when it came to paving. Some of the people I talked to who went to the meeting were overwhelmed with the numbers. Is there any way that someone can put together actual numbers that people can count on? When the school bond went through, my taxes went up $100 a year. I am glad to pay that. Can we put some kind of numbers together to explain to people what they will actually be paying? This subject needs to be taken care of. Let the citizens vote, after an informational meeting that doesn't scare everyone half to death.

    ReplyDelete
  12. well we need to fix the water lines before we do any paving. if you all recall seeing a few of them bust this last winter. i believe that was even told to some of us that would happen when we got the new water tower. lets work from the bottom up, it will be a lot easier Dorchester

    ReplyDelete
  13. Baby Boomers are the Flashback generation. We can't get any Respect!!

    ReplyDelete

Village Dweller checks all reader comments to determine if they are appropriate for print.