Sunday, June 8, 2008

Recognizing Dorchester's Latest Improvements

Since the Dorchester Times went online nearly 14 months ago, we have published numerous stories and reader comments regarding the areas of our community in need of improvement.

In one of our
early posts, we took issue with an Associated Press reporter who painted a negative picture of our community's appearance. However, at the time, we said the story served as a good reminder that Dorchester must make improvements to enhance our public image. As we said back then, image does matter.

We wrote: "Public image is what attracts growth or expedites decline in a community ... Dorchester residents should strive for the town to be known for more than its grain elevator ... The legacy we leave for our children and grandchildren is up to us."

Some readers will recall that we even dedicated our first online poll
to the subject of community improvement projects.

Well, there have been several changes in our small town over the past 14 months. And while much work is still needed, we would be remiss if we didn't acknowledge and recognize some of the recent enhancements.


The $4 million renovation and expansion of the Dorchester School campus has received the bulk of attention inside and outside of Dorchester. Rightfully so. But today, we pay tribute to those improvements that have been completed over the past year. Here are the top three, as we see them:

No. 3 - Main Street Electronic Marquee: Gone are the days of downtown Dorchester's baby-blue manual marquee. A larger, orange-and-black electronic sign now graces Dorchester's Main Street median. Installed last spring, the electronic marquee displays the date, time and temperature, while also announcing upcoming town events and special messages, including birthday greetings to residents. The new marquee has not only added some extra livliness to Washington Avenue, it has served as an effective method of mass communication.

No. 2 - Main Street Building Upgrades: Over the past 12 months, we've noted several improvements to Main Street's buildings. The old Conner's Gifts & Roofing building -- damaged by fire in the early 1980s -- was re-sided, as was one of the west side buildings. City Hall is now graced with decorative plants. Sherryl's West Side Saloon has expanded north. And members of the Dorchester Area Community Association (DACA) have worked on displays in the building north of the Saline State Bank.

No. 1 - City Park Shelter & New Playground Equipment: Perhaps the most notable improvement in Dorchester is the new City Park shelter and playground equipment. The new shelter was one of the first projects initiated by the Dorchester Area Community Foundation (DACF). Many area residents, former residents and DHS alumni have contributed to this project. The Foundation also received a $16,200 matching grant from the Nebraska Game and Parks. The improved and expanded play equipment area is also impressive. Again, leaders with the DACF applied for and received a $5,000 grant on behalf of the Village of Dorchester for the new playground equipment. The Village Board agreed to match the $5,000 grant from the Kiewit Foundation board. Several volunteers contributed their time to install the playground equipment.

We salute the leaders and property owners of Dorchester who made all of the above improvements a reality. As a result of their service, dedication and efforts, our town is a better place to live. Thanks to them, our quality of life has jumped another notch.

We anxiously await the next round of improvements in Dorchester -- on public and private properties -- and encourage all residents to help in this collective endeavor.

8 comments:

  1. I agree with you that image does matter. When I first left Nebraska many years ago, I was shocked at my naïveté. “Our” image to the rest of the country was not the wholesome, friendly picture that I carried in my youthful mind. When I returned to Nebraska, it was difficult to persuade residents that the state’s image prevented it from moving forward. Right or wrong, the outside world does not view us as open and progressive. On a related note, will you be doing a follow-up article on the improvements that have occurred in within the past 14 months?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for the prompt follow-up.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Some people had asked a while back for a summary of what the new park shelter cost. The shelter itself was $36,200, sidewalk $1,670, picnic tables, trash receptacles & grills $6,460 & serving tables $670Of the total $45,000, the Game & Parks grant paid $16,000 & the Village covered the electricity of $1000. The remaining $28,000 was paid by the Dorchester Area Community Foundation through memorials & various fundraisers. The most successful fundraiser was the engraved brick project that brought in enough dollars to cover the remaining cost of the project.
    The DACF would especially like to thank Kristi Nohavec who served as the project's architect (free of charge) for her long hours & hard work.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dweller, I agree with your listing of improvements. Now can the city remove those ugly old tree stumps? Why would anyone keep those in the park? Isn't a park supposed to be visually pleasing?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Who owns the white building east of the electronic billboard?

    It would make a good restaurant or coffee shop.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Handicapped ramp at Donna's Hair Creations new doors outside is Clean with flowers etc but nothing has ever been mentioned about this place this blogger is a hipocrite

    ReplyDelete
  7. Linda:

    We think you mean "hypocrite."

    ReplyDelete
  8. Joyce Karl said.......
    It hard to believe that Linda R wrote the article concerning Donna's Hair Creation and that Linda would misspell hypocrite. Have a feeling someone else wrote that article and signed Linda's name. If people can't sign their own name or at least sign it Anonymous, maybe they should refrain from responding. That being said, Donna's Hair Creations have made some nice improvements.

    ReplyDelete

Village Dweller checks all reader comments to determine if they are appropriate for print.