Thursday, September 11, 2008

Editorial: Public Image Counts

Back in May 2007, Dorchester made national news thanks to an Associated Press story on the dramatic increase in the construction across the Midwest due to the growth of the ethanol industry.

The AP story -- which appeared in newspapers across the state and nation -- was read by millions of Americans. A recent Google search by the Times found the article is still readily available on the Internet, on dozens of Web sites.

Set in Dorchester, the article opens with the following lead:

"DORCHESTER, Neb. -- Outside of two bars and a bank there’s little activity on Washington Street here, where more windows are covered by boards than 'Open' signs. But at the end of the street, semi-trailers stir the dust near a concrete symbol of economic activity. It towers over the signs of small-town decay ..."

As we stated some 16 months ago, the AP account portrays our town in a negative and unfair light. Dorchester certainly has more life and economic activity than journalist Jenkins reported. Yet, the story still serves as a good reminder that Dorchester needs to make improvements if we are to enhance our public image -- and our own quality of life.


We are encouraged by the many upgrades made across town over the last year. Recognition goes to the Dorchester Area Community Association and Foundation, as well as the individuals who made an investment of time and financial resources. The new school is remarkable -- it is a structure that any community would prize. We also recognize other enhancements, including the main street electronic marquee, upgrades made to the city park, and improvements of buildings along main street.

However, we are disappointed by some of the eyesores that remain -- eyesores that could be easily addressed. The sight of weeds growing on the sidewalk on the west side of main street, in front of blatantly neglected buildings, is an obvious reminder there is still work to be done. We are especially disappointed this has occurred on a very visible sidewalk less than half a block from Village Hall.

As we said previously, public image matters. Public image attracts growth to a community or expedites its decline. Again, we ask readers to take a minute to scroll down the left-hand column of this Web page and read the historical profile of Dorchester 120 years ago. Times were tough back then, too. But town leaders wanted Dorchester to be known for more than its train depot.


In 2008, let's hope that all Dorchester residents want our town to be known for more than its grain elevator, despite its significant contributions to the area economy.

13 comments:

  1. I just re-read the article. Which sentences are inaccurate?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Is it okay if I graze my cattle on them sidewalks?.....................

    ReplyDelete
  3. The east side of main street needs work, thats know doubt. From the red building to the end of the block to the south. But what can be done. Everyone doesnt want to make people made, but we made people put up fences, that didn't have the money. If you want it to look better, everyone else should to do the same. The reason the house to the south of the red building isnt selling, is I sure wouldnt what to live next to all those cars that are parked there. What can be done, lets ask our village board, you never get answers from them. Dorchester has always had a nasty looking downtown, and I have lived here a very long time. I know what has been done is great, and appreciate the people who made it happen, but how can you get anything done, treat everyone in town equal, set the rules, follow them. There is a place across from the church, what a mess, come village board, do something to make that mess go away. Its the church, make them put up a fence, please. I think that this is up to the board, the get off the butts, and put things in motion. And richard, instead of nasty remarks, why dont you write something usefull.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I will volunteer to wash the windows and sew curtains to put up. I will also gladly dust the trophies on the window ledge. As for the weeds...I have a nifty pair of gardening gloves just eager to pull away...not to mention 4 bunnies that would love the free meal! I am not sure who owns these buildings and I do not in any way mean to be rude but there is no reason they need to look the way they do.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I know I should run for village board myself instead of just leaving this comment, but I really hope some younger, more ambitious people start taking leadership roles in this town. I'm not really that young anymore and my kids are almost grown. I hope those with young kids or newly married would get involved with the town board or community groups. That would really change the community and for the better.

    ReplyDelete
  6. axoIf the city board doesn't care enough to make the owners do anything than how much do they really care about the town. Its like they just hold the position so that nobody else can get on the board to do anything about it. Let's get some new ones if they don't care enough to make Dorchester better.

    ReplyDelete
  7. its easy to sit back and complain, but how many of these people ran for the village board. WE have candidates for the board that havent attended a meeting. Come on, if you are interested in the village and think you want to be on the board, they should be at the meetings seeing what is going on.

    Its easy to take pot shots at the village board members.

    and....................there are tons of things in this town that arent right. If we are going to follow all rules, lets get the animals out of town. This includes the horses, the sheep and pigs, as well as the chickens and other fowl.

    We have people that have put up fences and then hide animals and other things behind the fences.

    Maybe we should make everyone put up fences, and rename our town.................

    Fortchester
    have a good day

    ReplyDelete
  8. That first picture is pretty damning. At least you balanced it with two positive pictures of good things that have happened.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous (Fortchester) makes some good points. In addition, the fastest way to actually run people out of town is to become yard/house nazi's and dictate what homeowners must do. Taking away property rights from homeowners will surely be the death of the town.

    Instead try and reward businesses that do take care of their property with your patronage and punish those that don't by refusing to do business with them (although I'm not sure what the owners of some of the buildings actually do for a living).

    I do agree with the general sentiment that to make a town prosper and attract people who want to live in it, that it is essential to have a downtown that looks good.

    ReplyDelete
  10. IT MIGHT BE TIME TO SERIOUSLY CONSIDER DECLARING THAT SIDE OF MAIN STREET A BLIGHT AND BRING IN THE BULLDOZERS. TEAR IT ALL DOWN FROM TYSERS TO THAT WHITE BUILDING. PUT IN A FLOWER GARDEN. EVEN GRASS WOULD LOOK BETTER. IT'S THAT BAD.

    ReplyDelete
  11. There were only 6 of us at the last DACA meeting Tuesday so maybe the word isn't out yet, but I am resigning as chairman of DACA effective 12/31/08. This would be a great opportunity for someone with lots of energy (mine is waning) to get a group of forward thinkers together to make more improvements to this community.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Carol, thanks for all your hard work. It's greatly appreciated.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Brent Zoubek would be good as head of DACA.

    ReplyDelete

Village Dweller checks all reader comments to determine if they are appropriate for print.