Wednesday, October 11, 2017

NEWS ROUNDUP: DHS Football Is Coming Back After Monday School Board Vote


Sources Say DHS Football Will Return In 2018: Next football season will bring the return of high school football to Dorchester on Friday nights.  That's according to sources who attended Monday night's Dorchester Public School board meeting.  The board vote was unanimous, we are told.  As we reported last month, Dorchester leaders have been exploring six-man football as an option for the past several months. A meeting of DPS parents and students was held in late September to discuss the options and requirements to go forward with the plan. An online survey of Times readers, conducted in late September, showed nearly three-quarters of readers said they do want DHS football to return. Dorchester has been without a football team of its own since 2013, as fewer enrolled boys in grades 9-12 and decreased participation rates raised questions whether a viable 8-man team could be fielded.  However, it seems six-man football is gaining popular support and more teams in our corner of the state, and the revival of Longhorn football is a real possibility next season.  There are reports that more than 40 Nebraska high schools will be playing the game next season, including Friend and other nearby schools.

Last Night's Volleyball Game Featured 'Pink Out':  Tuesday night's Dorchester High School volleyball games featured a lot of pink.  The school and its fan base conducted a "pink out" to support a cure to breast cancer.  The Lady 'Horns took on BDS and McCool Junction with games starting at 5:30 and 7:30 p.m.  DHS fell in both matches, dropping to 7-17 on the season.  The volleyball squad is off for the rest of the week until Saturday's CRC tournament in York.

Effort To Get Dorchester's Vacant Homes Filled By Spring 2018?: We received an e-mail from a town resident who wishes to remain anonymous, but says she wants this blog to explore ways to fill Dorchester's vacant homes within the next six months.  That would be a heavy lift and we're not exactly sure what a blog could do to instigate such a movement, but we do agree some kind of formal effort needs to be undertaken.  At one point within the past year, more than 20 homes in Dorchester were sitting vacant.  That is harmful in a community that needs more family housing, especially when the community sits just 8 minutes from Crete, 15 minutes from Seward, and 25 minutes from Lincoln.  If you have ideas to combat the issue of homes sitting vacant, please leave them in the "comments" section below.

8 comments:

  1. Implement a monthly fee for any house not being occupied. That money would then go into a fund towards paving.. a win win if you ask me

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. Town won't look at it though, it might ruffle feathers of people who would rather have cheap storage.

      Delete
  2. Implement a monthly fee for any house not being occupied. That money would then go into a fund towards paving.. a win win if you ask me

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So tired of hearing about penalties on empty houses. Isn't everyone free to do what they want with their own property as long as it is legal and the yards and houses are properly maintained and don't become a nuisance in the neighborhood? Those properties are being assessed taxes just like occupied houses so if paving ever does happen in Dorchester (I doubt it will) those houses will be paying their fair share. And sometimes there are reasons that are not necessarily apparent to everyone as to why those houses may be unoccupied for a time. Quit judging all those folks!

      Delete
    2. Our town and our future so we have a right to shape it as we want. Too many in the past buried their heads in the sand and problems grew rapidly in a short span.

      Time to turn that ship around. I like the idea of heavily penalizing empty homes and the league of municipalities is working on legislation to give town boards more authority to do so. Can't happen too soon.

      Delete
  3. Really? Friend playing 6 man football? A town of 1100 people?? I remember when Friend was bucking the state athletic agency a while back refusing to play 11 man illegally despite having sufficient numbers and instead choosing to play 8 man so they could win more games. Now they want to play 6 man ball??? C'mon Man!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think the Town board should force every house hold to have at least children, If not they should be fined and the money should go towards paving, then its a win win for Dorchester ,,, paving and eleven man football,,, maskes about as much sense as the first post !!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dumb, dumb, dumb.

      Defending slops and vacant homes is a recipe for a sad life! Must be cynical richard at it again!

      Delete

Village Dweller checks all reader comments to determine if they are appropriate for print.