Friday, September 13, 2013

DHS Crowns Kahle, Creamer Homecoming Queen, King


On Sept. 12, Dorchester High School celebrated its 2013 homecoming during a volleyball
triagular held in the refurbished DHS gym.  

This year marked the first time since the late 1940s that the traditional homecoming ceremonies were not held in coordination with a Longhorn football game.

By popular vote of the student body, DHS seniors Lydia Kahle and Tiernan Creamer were crowed queen and king.

On the volleyball court, DHS dropped both contests, one to Giltner and one to Hampton. 

The young Lady Longhorns showed more signs of improvements and had strong support from the DHS faithful, which seemed to realize 80 percent of the team is comprised of freshmen and sophomores.

Meanwhile, the Milford-Dorchester Eagles football team will host Ashland-Greenwood tonight at 7 p.m. in Milford.

17 comments:

  1. I just have a feeling DHS is on the cusp of very bright times at the school. YOu can see it in the attitudes of the freshman and junior high kids, as well as the potential in the grade schoolers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you are right on target. Whenever I walk in the building EVERYONE is so positive, polite, and cheerful including both new and experienced staff members. The students look like they enjoy being at school. The building itself is comfortable and clean. Let the good times roll.......very bright times on the horizon!

      Delete
  2. Amen to the comments above. I'm a parent of elementary student at DPS, but I feel we have the right mix of teachers and administration now to set Dorchester Schools on the right path for years to come.

    I like this blog's survey results on the need to build more school spirit through all-grade level activities. Involve everyone, not just the high school kids. Parents, I suggest taking your kids to games, even the milford high school games, to get your little ones excited about representing the school through activities.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I would just like to make people aware that I am not part of the Dorchester Times Staff. They just used my photo without asking permission even though it has a copyright watermark on it. Next time you would like to use a photo of mine ASK FIRST before you copy and paste my photo to your blog!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. The photo attached to this story has been altered by the times staff if you look at the same picture on my facebook page you will notice that the © symbol has been cropped out of the picture they put on their blog.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It might be your screen. My computer very clearly shows your copyright. Did they steal it from your camera? Or from your computer?? If you put it on Instagram or Facebook or Twitter, be warned that it's public., copyright or no copyright.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I see "Tony Ladely Photography" in the corner. Is that what she's talking about?

    ReplyDelete
  7. If someone takes the time to copyright their work, the copyright should be respected. 'Nuff said.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree David but you realize that just because you put a copyright on your work, whether its film or music or photography or writing, that you lose that "copyright" when you use it on public forums like facebook which is owned by facebook, right?

      Delete
    2. Not so. You do not lose your copyright by posting on a public form any more than you lose a book copyright by selling the book in a public bookstore or lose a movie copyright by showing it in a public theater.

      Delete
  8. Looks like someone lost out on free advertising. That said, does anyone know of a good area photographer who does senior pics?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dear Readers:

    The Times staff rarely comments on the stories we post. However in this case, we feel compelled to explain our actions.

    The Times did indeed acquire the homecoming photo from a link sent to us by a Facebook user. We felt that Times readers would enjoy the image of the DHS homecoming court.

    To ensure proper credit for the source of the photograph, we included the photographer's name at the bottom right of the photo; we felt this was adequate recognition, leaving no doubt where the photo came from.

    The photographer later informed us, through her comments above, that she objected to our use of the photo, so it was promptly removed -- less than two hours after her complaint was aired.

    We consider this issue resolved and we will no longer use this photographer's work.

    Thank you for your continued readership.

    -Dorchester Times staff

    ReplyDelete
  10. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  13. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Dear Readers:

    No more comments will be allowed regarding the topic of the homecoming photograph we originally used since the other party involved is not here to comment.

    As we stated previously, the photographer objected, we complied with her wishes, took down the Facebook photo, and will respect her wishes in the future by not using her images.

    We apologize for any emotional strain we may have caused.

    -Dorchester Times staff

    ReplyDelete

Village Dweller checks all reader comments to determine if they are appropriate for print.