Wednesday, January 2, 2008

Giltner Housing Project Is Good Model For Dorchester

In tiny Giltner, Neb. (population 407), fostering growth isn't just a nice thing to try; it's essential to survival. In that respect, Dorchester and Giltner share more than just school colors.

According to a recent article in the Grand Island Independent, several Giltner residents have banded together to work to provide adequate housing via a 29-lot development, called Parkside Subdivision.

The project is not so much a business venture as it is a recruiting tool. Like Dorchester, the Hamilton County village has lost interested potential residents because there simply aren't enough adequate or modern houses or lots.

According to the Independent's story, seven couples came together to form a limited-liability corporation when they finally had enough money to develop a large chunk of land that had been available.

Greg Ashby, a member of the development group, said bringing families in and keeping student enrollment up are essential to maintain a school district that is the community's lifeblood. "I've seen other towns that have lost their school, and it seems like they've lost their identity," Ashby said. "It just seems like that's the first nail in the coffin when you do lose a school district."

Because Giltner is within a 25-minute drive from Aurora, Grand Island and Hastings, the developers say Giltner is a convenient place to enjoy small-town Nebraska life. The lots, 15,000 to 30,000 square feet, range from $7,500 to $15,000. The village has chipped in as well to see the subdivision developed. It's providing water, sewer and electric extensions to the lots. The city will install electricity as needed and water as needed, with about 1,000 feet of water main to be added beginning this spring to complete a loop in the area. It will bond the costs of sewer improvements. Members of the development group said a handful of the subdivision's lots are spoken for, and they will likely ramp up their promotion of it once the city's improvements are made next spring.

The project is one of several pro-active steps community members have taken over the past several years. A new $600,000 community center is under construction, and a community foundation and a cooperative school promotion group have recently been formed. The town has also aggressively tried to sell itself to newcomers through its annual Experience Giltner tour of homes.

Our take: Modern housing and a good school are the basic building blocks for any community. Dorchester has a leg up on Giltner, with the $4 million school renovation project currently underway and our proximity to Lincoln -- the state's second-largest employment base. However, Dorchester is falling behind in the race to develop new, attractive homes suitable for younger working families, as well as retirees.

We hope more than a few Dorchester residents will consider a collective development effort such as the one taking place in Giltner, which has 200 fewer residents than our town. As the Times has mentioned previously, we tip our hat to citizens such as Ron Zoubek, who currently has lots for sale in northwest Dorchester.

However, for such a housing effort to be a true success, it will take assistance from the Village Board and the entire community. Like Giltner, Dorchester's Village Board needs to offer water, sewer and electric service to any lots offered by folks who have the town's best interests in mind.

Because the long-term success of Dorchester depends on good housing, the Times will actively support any incumbent or challenger for Village Board who promotes actions such as those occurring in Giltner.

6 comments:

  1. This is exactly what Dorchester needs. Of course if we had paved streets it would come a little more easily.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bravo for the good people of Giltner......... that's using the old bean .............. but I don't think our school is in any danger of disappearing unlike Giltner's ............ by the way, I heard Friend is pouring cash into its school ........ gotta keep up with the Joneses, I guess......

    ReplyDelete
  3. As someone currently in the market for a new home, I highly recommend pursuing this venture. I'd love to live in Dorchester. The obvious benefits for the town have already been stated in the article but the benefits for the buyers could be lower price for equal housing as compared to larger towns and housing that has space around it. New homes these days have small yards because sellers try and pack in as many lots as they can for profit. Neighborhood associations destroy the right of choice but to their credit, no one wants to live next to a rainbow colored house. I don't think Dorchester would have to do either of these. Also, keep in mind that this is Dorchester and lot prices should reflect that. Lot size and price can easily deter, rather than attract, potential buyers expecially since there is no golf course, lake, etc to build around. Developers seem to hike up lot prices unnecessarily. Also for development opportunities, the building of low income housing and apartments could be a cash cow. Those would require careful planning as those don't sit well with regular housing developments/established neighborhoods for their own property value and dwellers of such housing. I believe new housing developments are a must and I'm sure there's enough money in a few pockets that this could easily come to fruition. Just think of all that new property tax - wonder what it could be used for?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with the comments from anonymous above. To offset higher property taxes, you gotta grow the tax base. Bring more young people here with attractive, mid-priced housing opportunities.

    Who owns the farm ground directly north of the road at the north edge of town? That would be a good location. Also, there is lots of farm ground to the east and south of town. I think the owners of the land should be approached and see if they are willing to sell at market prices. Maybe they could be part of the group of developers.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I belive this is a great idea, but you have to get it by, the person that runs the village office, good luck on that.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Property taxes is whats keeping people from building ......... in town and in the country........ why cant we get those lowered? .... I want an answer from my county board members........

    ReplyDelete

Village Dweller checks all reader comments to determine if they are appropriate for print.